A familiar editor, sections, and access rights. On top — AI that answers the question instead of returning forty links. Articles are stored as plain files in your own environment, not in a vendor's closed database: there won't be a next migration
The problem was never the editor — it was that knowledge sat in a vendor's closed database, and the vendor decided your fate. Most alternatives offer the same design one more time
Knowledge in someone else's database
An alternative stores articles in its own closed format. You can read them only with its program — you depend on a vendor again
You can't take it back
The only way to get knowledge back is an export button the vendor built. What comes out, and in what form, isn't your call
AI is bolted on the side
AI search is added on top of the closed base and gets trimmed pieces of articles. Answers come out shallow: the context was cut at the input